Аудио-википедия

База знаний по hi-fi и high-end технике и комплектующим, отзывы и впечатления

Инструменты пользователя

Инструменты сайта


5speakers:4dyn:supr

Различия

Показаны различия между двумя версиями страницы.

Ссылка на это сравнение

Предыдущая версия справа и слева Предыдущая версия
5speakers:4dyn:supr [2020/02/29 10:59]
staudio
5speakers:4dyn:supr [2020/11/23 14:57] (текущий)
staudio [285 GMF]
Строка 6: Строка 6:
 {{ :5speakers:4dyn:165ts_1_.jpg?direct |}} {{ :5speakers:4dyn:165ts_1_.jpg?direct |}}
 ==== 285 GMF ==== ==== 285 GMF ====
-{{ :5speakers:4dyn:1600px-285_gmf.jpg?direct |}}+{{ :5speakers:4dyn:1600px-285_gmf.jpg?direct |}}\\ 
 +\\ 
 +https://www.diyaudio.com/forums/multi-way/340786-1-cd-seos-supravox.html\\ 
 +\\ 
 +https://www.diyaudio.com/forums/full-range/321786-supravox-165-alnico-vs-exc-ob.html\\ 
 +Hi again, I've listened extensively the GMF and Alnico versions.\\ 
 +The Alnico version had a very weak magnet (2.3BL) with more than 1Q in comparison to my GMF pair with 0.5Q.\\ 
 +The Alnico clearly won the subjective tests and listening. It is a true full-range driver with all the highs you want.\\ 
 +The GMF doesn't have enough highs and it sounds like a midrange driver (ironically Supravox names it as a "bass medium" driver).\\ 
 +The GMF also has a cold and aggressive upper-midrange which ruins the overall nice neutral timbre.\\ 
 +165-2000 has better tonality with naturally warmer timbre.\\ 
 +165-2000 has better microdynamics and better vocal expressions - probably the lower MMS is the answer but I'm not sure. 
  
5speakers/4dyn/supr.1582963172.txt.gz · Последнее изменение: 2020/02/29 10:59 — staudio